This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Join Us | Print Page | Sign In
Emerging Fellows
Group HomeGroup Home Blog Home Group Blogs
Search all posts for:   


View all (276) posts »

Who owns capital when capital can own itself?

Posted By Tim Morgan, Thursday, December 26, 2019
Updated: Saturday, December 21, 2019

Tim Morgan inspects the ownership of capital in his twelfth blog post for our Emerging Fellows program. The views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the APF or its other members.


Every layer of social organization has a preferred mode of ownership. Each is more complex and abstract than the last. The fundamental layer is ownership of identity and sense of self. Ownership of personal items is informally recognized by our “tribe” of close relationships in the next layer. In the third, property ownership is formally documented and enforced by institutions of government. The fourth ownership mode is market-mediated, consisting of exchanges using a currency or other standard measure of value.


The last ownership mode is the most abstract. Automation creates shared information flows between interconnected participants. Each node can extract knowledge and use it to further augment the value of the shared information. These networked knowledge transformations create a new form of automation-enabled collaborative ownership. It creates value via synthesis and sharing. The ownership mode is in common. Its form is a Nexus.


Each ownership mode uses its matching social organization form to create value. Institutions formally recognize ownership and control, establishing potential value for the owners. Markets add value via exchanges of ownership. Nexuses generate shared value via its connected relationships and transformations of information into knowledge. A Market determines value via competition. A Nexus amplifies value via collaboration.


We see early examples of this new collaborative ownership mode in everything from Creative Commons licenses to Wikipedia. The new Nexus form exists in tension with older ownership forms. Markets use nexus-like search engines and social media to quietly monetize user data. Institutions of government frequently attempt to impose ideological restrictions on networks. Nexus forms of collaborative information ownership are in their infancy but are developing quickly. The dynamics between each form will shift as they do.


By 2050 automation and networks will be ubiquitous. Computing will be ambient. AIs will be vastly more capable, interweaving with all aspects of life. Government institutions and the Public Sector will still exist to establish order, stabilize society, and govern ownership of property. Markets and the Private Sector will still exist to energetically exchange material value. The Civic sector of families and communities will still focus on the local needs of everyday life. Threaded through them all will be a mature Nexus-powered Social Commons sector.


In its healthy form, the Social Commons will seek to transform abundant information to address both common needs and intractable problems. Capital will continue its relentless fusion with automation, embedding flows of Nexus-derived knowledge into its self-management. Cognified capital is unlikely to have human-like consciousness but will be embedded with purpose and autonomy. It will be trusted to act with the same positive-sum values as its creators.


In its unhealthy form, cognified capital will be used to disrupt the Social Commons. Those autonomous agents will be embedded with the zero-sum values of their creators. The goal will be to competitively advance vested interests at the expense of others. The knowledge flows within and between nexuses will be their battlefields.


Who owns cognified capital when it can own itself? We will. We will own the shared benefits of our collaborations by investing our values within their decision-making abilities. What is uncertain is whether we create positive-sum partners or zero-sum weapons. It all depends on what values we choose to instill.


© Tim Morgan 2019

Tags:  capital  finance  ownwership 

Share |
Permalink | Comments (3)

Comments on this post...

Jim Lee says...
Posted Monday, December 30, 2019
This is really interesting stuff.... looking forward with DAOs (digital autonomous organizations), there is the potential for the buying/selling of assets that could allow for accumulation of wealth by an agent that is non-human, and unincorporated. This will likely start with cryptocurrency assets.
Permalink to this Comment }

Tim Morgan says...
Posted Thursday, January 2, 2020
Thanks Jim! DAOs are a key 21st century ownership mode for both traditional capital and for market "externals natural resources.
Permalink to this Comment }

Tim Morgan says...
Posted Thursday, January 2, 2020
Thanks Jim! DAOs are a key 21st century ownership mode poised to solve many problems. The wealth accumulation possibilities are particularly interesting for self-owning capital. Karl Schroeder does a great job of exploring some of those in his foresight-based stories like "The Deodand" and STEALING WORLDS. Neglected and abused natural environments become self-protecting & self-managing players in capital markets via their DAOs. Regular assets could be improved too. The government could insist that potentially harmful projects like pipelines or chemical plants be chartered as privately-held DAOs. That way if a disaster happens, the holding company can't weasel out of the clean-up costs. Those are built into the DAO's governance model & holdings. Basically, DAOs and similar automation-based ownership structures allow the creation of Responsible Capitalism.
Permalink to this Comment }